Seriously, this sort of nonsense has to stop:
“What I am trying to do in this interview is to make people aware of the fact that the threat is real, the threat is different, the threat is constant,” he said.
And the threat is from?
What was uppermost on his mind, however, is the alarming rise in the number of Americans who are more than willing to attack and kill their fellow citizens.
Yes?Â And who are these Americans? What do they have in common?
“It is one of the things that keeps me up at night,” Holder said. “You didnâ€™t worry about this even two years ago â€” about individuals, about Americans, to the extent that we now do. And â€” that is of â€” of great concern.”
“The threat has changed from simply worrying about foreigners coming here, to worrying about people in the United States, American citizens â€” raised here, born here, and who for whatever reason, have decided that they are going to become radicalized and take up arms against the nation in which they were born,” he said.
Hello â€“ what else have they in common?Â What has â€œradicalizedâ€ them?
In the last 24 months, Holder said, 126 people have been indicted on terrorist-related charges, Fifty of those people are American citizens.
“I think that what is most alarming to me is the totality of what we see, the attorney general said. “Whether it is an attempt to bomb the New York City subway system, an attempt to bring down an airplane over Detroit, an attempt to set off a bomb in Times Square â€¦ I think that gives us a sense of the breadth of the challenges that we face, and the kinds of things that our enemy is trying to do.”
Holder says many of these converts to al Qaeda have something in common: a link to radical cleric Anwar Al Awlaki, an American citizen himself.
And Al Awlaki and al Qaeda are both driven by what?Â Al Awlaki is what sort of cleric?
“Heâ€™s an extremely dangerous man. He has shown a desire to harm the United States, a desire to strike the homeland of the United States,” Holder said. “He is a person who â€” as an American citizen â€” is familiar with this country and he brings a dimension, because of that American familiarity, that others do not.”
Holder said that as a threat to the United States, Awlaki ranks right up there with Osama bin Laden.
“He would be on the same list with bin Laden,” the attorney general said. “Heâ€™s up there. I donâ€™t know whether heâ€™s one, two, three, four â€” I donâ€™t know. But heâ€™s certainly on the list of the people who worry me the most.”
Yes, yes and what is the common thread between Awlaki, bin Laden, al Qaeda and the people who keep Holder up at night?
“I have to have all those tools available to me to try to keep the American people safe, and to do the job that Iâ€™m supposed to do as a 21st century attorney general,” Holder said.
Holder said the United States has made great strides in improving its ability to detect and block attacks, which is shown by the number of would-be terrorists who have been stopped before they could kill Americans. The intelligence community is working around the clock, he said, with little time off.
Well acknowledging that every single one of the â€œterroristsâ€ or â€œradicalsâ€ among the 50 or so apprehended this year was Muslim or a convert to Islam might go a long way in identifying the threat.Â Osama bin Laden, Al Awlaki and the 50 Americans all have in common their brand of radical Islam.Â Al Qaeda didnâ€™t just pop up because it thought it would be fun to target and kill Americans, it exists because its followers believe in a radical brand of Islam that instructs them to make war against infidels.Â And America is considered the infidel of infidel nations.Â Ergo, it is their primary target.
Without the underlying thread of their radical beliefs, they have no real reason to attack us.Â But, acknowledging that all 50 of the â€œAmericansâ€ were Muslim and the fact that all 126 arrested shared that same radical faith would mean acknowledging that Muslims are 100% of the problem.Â Canâ€™t do that and search granny at the airport (in the name of fairness)can we?Â Canâ€™t do that and risk the charge of â€œprofilingâ€ â€“ something we absolutely ought to be doing until circumstance or evidence lead us to do otherwise.
If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed!