This is where the secularist agenda is headed.Â Â If Christians can be declared “unfit” as foster parents because of their religious beliefs, how long before they’re considered “unfit” to parent their own children?Â Or homeschool?Â Or work as psychologists,Â teachers, atheletes,Â coaches,Â military chaplains, nurses,Â small business owners, orÂ any other job that has an influence on society’s worldview?Â
Secularists are not interested in religious liberty or “tolerance”.Â They want to marginalize Christians andÂ Biblical beliefs until society is completely purged of them.
In a landmark judgment, which will have a serious impact on the future of fostering and adoption in the UK, the High Court has suggested that Christians with traditional views on sexual ethics are unsuitable as foster carers, and that homosexual â€˜rightsâ€™ trump freedom of conscience in the UK. The Judges stated that Christian beliefs on sexual ethics may be â€˜inimicalâ€™ to children, and they implicitly upheld an Equalities and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) submission that children risk being â€˜infectedâ€™ by Christian moral beliefs.
Todayâ€™s ruling relates to the dispute between married couple Eunice and Owen Johns and Derby City Council.Â The Johns applied to the Council in 2007 to foster a child but the Council blocked their application because they objected that the Johns were not willing to promote the practise of homosexuality to a young child. In November 2010 bothÂ parties jointly asked the Court to rule on whether the Johns were able to foster children, or whether they could be excluded from doing so under equality law because of their Christian beliefs.
Today (28th February) that judgment has been released. The judges declined to make the statement that the Johns, wanting to re-establish their fostering application, had sought. Instead, the judgment strongly affirms homosexual rights over freedom of conscience and leaves the Johns currently unable to foster a child as desired, despite their proven track record as foster parents. There now appears to be nothing to stop the increasing bar on Christians who wish to adopt or foster children but who are not willing to compromise their beliefs by promoting the practise of homosexuality to small children.
The nature of the judgment means that Christians who hold orthodox Christian views on the family, marriage and sexuality will continue to face difficulties in the fostering and adoption process and the Courts will not intervene to stop this from happening. In fact, the summary contained in the judgment sends out the clear message that orthodox Christian ethical beliefs are potentially harmful to children and that Christian parents with mainstream Christian views are not suitable to be considered as potential foster parents.