The proof is in the numbers.
The U.S.Â has never before had a President who thinks so little of the American people that he imagines he can win re-election running on the opposite of reality.Â But that is the reality of President Obama today.
Waving a planted press commentary, Obama recently claimed on the campaign stump, â€œfederal spending since I took office has risen at the slowest pace of any President in almost 60 years.â€
Peggy Noonan aptly summarized in last weekendâ€™sÂ Wall StreetÂ JournalÂ the take away by the still holding majority of Americans living in the real world:
â€œThere is, now, a house-of-cards feel about this administration.Â Â It became apparent some weeks ago when the President talked on the stump â€“ where else? â€“ about an essay by a fellow who said spending growth [under Obama] is actually lower than that of previous Presidents.Â Â This was startling to a lot of people, who looked into it and found the man had left out most spending from 2009, the first year of Mr. Obamaâ€™s Presidency.Â Â People sneered: The President was deliberately using a misleading argument to paint a false picture!Â Â But you know, why would he go out there waiving an article that could immediately be debunked?Â Â Maybe because he thought it wasÂ true.Â Â Thatâ€™s more alarming, isnâ€™t it, the idea that he knows so little about the effects of his own economic program that he thinks he really is a low spender.â€
What this shows most importantly is that the recognition is starting to break through to the general public regarding the Presidentâ€™s rhetorical strategy thatÂ Iâ€™ve have been calling Calculated Deception.Â The latter is deliberately using a misleading argument to paint a false picture.Â Â That has been a central Obama practice not only throughout his entire presidency, but also as the foundation of his 2008 campaign strategy, and actually throughout hisÂ whole career.
Rest assured, Ms. Noonan, that the President is not as nuts as he may seem at times.Â Â He knowsÂ very well thatÂ he is not aÂ careful spender.Â Â His whole mission is to transformÂ the U.S.Â not intoÂ a Big Government country, but a Huge Government country, because only a country run by a Huge Government can be satisfactorily controlled by superior, all wise and beneficent individuals like himself.Â Â That is why he is at minimum a Swedish socialist, if not worse.Â Â Notice, though, how far behind the times he and his weak minded supporters are, as even the Swedes have abandoned Swedish socialism as a failure.
[…] Â In sharp contrast to Reagan, Obamaâ€™s first major legislative initiative was the so-called stimulus, whichÂ increasedÂ future federal spending by nearly a trillion dollars, the most expensive legislation in history up till that point.Â Â We know now, as thinking people knew at the time, that this record shattering spending bill only stimulated government spending, deficits and debt.Â Â Contrary to official Democrat Keynesian witchcraft, you donâ€™t promote economic recovery, growth and prosperity by borrowing a trillion dollars out of the economy to spend a trillion dollars back into it.
But this was just a warm up for Obamaâ€™s Swedish socialism.Â Â Obama worked with Pelosiâ€™s Democratic Congress to pass an additional, $410 billion, supplemental spending bill for fiscal year 2009, which was too much even for big spending President Bush, who had specifically rejected it in 2008.Â Â NextÂ in 2009 came a $40 billion expansion in the SCHIP entitlement program, as if we didnâ€™t already have way more than too much entitlement spending.
After just one year of the Obama spending binge, federal spending had already rocketed to 25.2% of GDP, the highest in American history except for World War II.Â Â That compares to 20.8% in 2008, and an average of 19.6% during Bushâ€™s two terms.Â Â The average during President Clintonâ€™s two terms was 19.8%, and during the 60-plus years from World War II until 2008 â€” 19.7%.Â Â Obamaâ€™s own fiscal 2013 budget released in February projects the average during the entire 4 years of the Obama Administration to come in at 24.4% in just a few months.Â Â That budget shows federal spending increasing from $2.983 trillion in 2008 to an all time record $3.796 trillion in 2012, an increase of 27.3%.
Moreover, before Obama there had never been a deficit anywhere near $1 trillion.Â Â The highest previously was $458 billion, or less than half a trillion, in 2008.Â The federal deficit for the last budget adopted by a Republican controlled Congress was $161 billion for fiscal year 2007.Â Â But the budget deficits for Obamaâ€™s four years were reported in Obamaâ€™s own 2013 budget as $1.413 trillion for 2009, $1.293 trillion for 2010, $1.3 trillion for 2011, and $1.327 trillion for 2012, four years in a row of deficits of $1.3 trillion or more, the highest in world history.
President Obamaâ€™s own 2013 budget shows that as a result federal debt held by the public will double during Obamaâ€™s four years as President.Â Â That means in just one term President Obama will have increased the national debt as much as all prior Presidents, from George Washington to George Bush, combined.