How is it possible to re-elect a man who has kept the country at over 7.9% unemployment for four years, added $6 trillion in debt, caused the price of gas and other essentials to double, armed Mexican drug cartels with American guns, promised Russia he’d be more “flexible” in giving them our missile defenses in a second term, watched live in the situation room and refused to send help as four Americans were killed by terrorists in Libya, and smuggled arms to Syrian rebels linked with Al Qaeda?
Simple: have a mainstream media in your corner that refuses to report the news that voters need to know. Â They refused to report on the Benghazi scandal. Â They shelved stories about pending layoffs and tax hikes until that could hurt Obama’s re-election efforts. Â They spun terrible jobs numbers. Â They attacked all Republican candidates as anti-woman, anti-middle class, pro-millionaire, and otherwise “extreme.” Â They even waited 7 days to report that Iran had fired on one of our drones.
They really outdid themselves this time. Â The average American voter was kept in the dark about what he/she was truly voting for…and it showed.
Rich Noyes lists “Five ways the mainstream media tipped the scales in favor of Obama“:
1. The Mediaâ€™s Biased Gaffe Patrol Hammered Romney:Â The media unfairly jumped on Â inconsequential mistakes â€” or even invented controversies â€” from Romney and hyped them in to multi-day media â€œearthquakes.â€ Â […]
2. Pounding Romney With Partisan Fact Checking:Â Thereâ€™s nothing wrong with holding politicians accountable for the honesty of their TV ads and stump speeches, but this year the self-appointed media fact-checkers attacked Republicans as liars for statements that were accurate. […]
3. Those Biased Debate Moderators:Â Upset liberals scorned PBSâ€™s Jim Lehrer for taking a hands-off approach in the first debate on October 3, with MSNBC analyst Howard Fineman slamming him as â€œpractically uselessÂ â€ for not jumping into the debate on behalf of President Obama.
Such criticism may have encouraged theÂ activist approachÂ taken by ABCâ€™s Martha Raddatz in the vice presidential debate October 11, and by CNNâ€™s Candy Crowley in theÂ October 16 town hall debate, as both of those journalists repeatedly interrupted the Republican candidate and larded the discussion with a predominantly liberal agenda. […]
4. The Benghazi Blackout:Â Right after the September 11 attack in Libya, the networksÂ proclaimedÂ that the events would bolster President Obama â€” â€œreminding voters of his power as commander-in-chief,â€ as NBCâ€™s Peter Alexander stated on the September 14 edition of “Today.” But as a cascade of leaked information erased the portrait of Obama as a heroic commander, the broadcast networks shunted the Benghazi story to the sidelines. Â […]
5. Burying the Bad Economy:Â Pundits agreed that Obamaâ€™s weakness was the failure of the US economy to revive after his expensive stimulus and four years of $1 trillion deficits. But the major networks failed to offer the sustained, aggressive coverage of the economy that incumbent Republican President George H.W. Bush faced in 1992, or even that George W. Bush faced in 2004 â€” both years when the national economy was in better shape than it is now.
Networks that hammered President George W. Bush for high gas prices and high unemployment gave their candidate almost a complete pass â€“ blaming Bush more than twice as much as Obama. On Election Day, unemployment was 7.9 percent, actually higher than it had been when Obama took office. Debt, deficit and underemployment were off the charts.
Obama didnâ€™t win despite the numbers. He won because the media didnâ€™t report them. They spent an entire campaign promoting social issues â€“ abortion, gay marriage and more â€“ where journalists near 100 percent support. The onslaught against GOP candidates was huge. The left/media strategy was merely to link Romney with any social conservative they could and hype what that candidate said.
Media Research Center President L. BrentÂ BozellÂ summed up the campaign news coverage by calling journalism â€œroadkill.â€ â€œThe media lauded Obama no matter how horrendous his record, and they savaged Obamaâ€™s Republican contenders as ridiculous pretenders,â€ he wrote.