Obama has declared that he will not sign any bill that doesn’t include massive tax hikes for any individual or small business who makes more than $250K. Â Even though the top 1% already pay more income taxes than the bottom 80%. Â Even though his proposed tax hikes would only pay for 8 days of government spending. Â This has nothing to do with helping the middle class or paying down the deficit: it has everything to do with Obama’s ideological hatred for “the rich” and imposing his twisted Marxist vision of “fairness,” no matter who gets hurt.
Charles Krauthammer nailed it in this interview when he observed that Obama’s agenda is to destroy the Republicans, not to fix the economy:
View on YouTube
“Why are Republicans allowing the entire debate to be about taxes and about the war among Republicans over holding the line on the Norquist pledge or not, when what Obama is proposing on raising the rates on the 2% is a triviality? It will reduce the deficit from 1.10 trillion to 1.02 trillion, 8 cents on the dollar. It is nothing. Itâ€™s lunch money, itâ€™s a rounding error. And yet thatâ€™s all the debate that we are hearing. Obama understands this. Heâ€™s not trying to fix our fiscal issues and problems. Heâ€™s trying to destroy the Republicans by insisting that there is a split among the Republicans on this issue which has held them together, the same way it destroyed President Bush Senior when he went back on the pledge he made. This is a political attack on the Republicans. There is no evidence right now that he has any interest in the real fiscal issue because he would have to talk about spending and entitlements and he isnâ€™t.”
â€œWhat [Obama] proposed this week was a classic bait and switch on the American peopleâ€”a tax increase double the size of what he campaigned on, billions of dollars in new stimulus spending and an unlimited, unchecked authority to borrow from the Chinese,â€Â Sen. Orrin Hatch (R-Utah) said in Saturdayâ€™s weekly GOP address.
â€œMaybe I missed it but I donâ€™t recall him asking for any of that during the presidential campaign. These ideas are so radical that they have already been rejected on a bipartisan basis by Congress.â€
Mike Flynn asks, “Where Are Democrats Willing To Compromise?”
Where are the Democrats standing up to their special interests and proposing compromises contrary to their base? Where is the Democrat saying, you know what, we can’t keep posting trillion+ deficits? Demographics make Social Security and Medicare unsustainable, yet not a single national Democrat will admit that.
Why is the media not seeking out some “adult” Democrat who is willing to admit that we have a serious spending problem and need to reform entitlements? Why do Democrats simply get to deliver pablum that we need a “balanced” approach, but never have to articulate both sides of this balance?
I’ve been around long enough to realize these questions answer themselves. Only the GOP has to compromise its closely held beliefs. The Democrats, who arguably have created this entire mess, never have to question their basic assumptions. They have failed to produce a budget for four years and are currently spending more money than LBJ and FDR ever dreamed of spending, yet no one can question this basic framework.
Obama is putting out unreasonable demands in the hopes that Republicans will either alienate their fiscalÂ conservativeÂ base by complying, or take the blame for the fall-out if they refuse, which recent polls indicate is very likely, thanks to the help of the media. Â He’s evenÂ making the ridiculous claimÂ that a GOP refusal to accept his outrageous offer will spoil Christmas.
How is it that the GOP is so feckless and ineffective that it can’t even convince the 48% who voted for Romney that raising taxes on those making over $250,000 is both pointless and bad policy:
Sixty percent of all Americans back higher taxes on higher incomes in the new Post-ABC data. Earlier this month, an identical 60 percent of voters in the presidential election said income taxes should be raised on income over $250,000, according to the national exit poll.
Only 37% oppose the tax hike.
Other than a complete inability to communicate, there’s no rhyme or reason for this. Facts, logic, and history are all with us in this debate, but we still can’t make our case to more than 37% of adults?
We lost here, though, the moment Obama and the media were able to make the deficit reduction debate center on a silly tax increase as opposed to spending decreases.
How is it possible for Democrats to be losing a debate over raising taxes in the middle of the longest, worst recession since the Great Depression? Because they’re too afraid to STAND UP AND MAKE THE ARGUMENT! We need BOLD leaders who don’t have Stockholm syndrome, aren’t intimidated by the predictable liberal playbook, and aren’t ashamed to argue for the conservative principles they claim to represent!
The Democrats are using typical Alinsky scare tactics. But instead of anticipating the predictable Democrat playbook and being prepared to counterattack, the GOP establishment will cower and cave like a scolded puppy. Obama’s playing them like a fiddle.
Several Republicans have already indicated that they plan to violate their Norquist Pledge against raising taxes:
Today, multiple high-ranking Republicans announced that they were willing to raise taxes as part of a deal to avoid the â€œfiscal cliff,â€ breaking the pledges they had made to Grover Norquistâ€™s Americans for Tax Reform.
Norquist has responded by calling them Democrat “pawns,” which they are:
The leader of Americans for Tax Reform told Human Events that Republicans should be ashamed to be part of the Democratic media campaign to raise taxes.
â€œThey should be embarrassed,â€ said Grover G. Norquist, the founder and president of the Washington-based ATR.
[…] Â Despite the barrage of attacks against him, and reports of defections, the â€œTaxpayer Protection Pledgeâ€ he asks every candidate to make to the voters is not going away, he said.
â€œThe truth is that 90-plus percent of the pledge signers, they sign the pledge because they have no intention of raising taxes,â€ said the Massachusetts expatriate.
â€œThey are very comfortable making that commitment because it never occurs to them to raise taxes. They know taxes are bad for the economy. They know raising taxes kills jobs,â€ he said. â€œWhy would they raise taxes if they know the problem is spending?â€
Republicans used to believe in free enterprise, the private sector, and low taxes. They believed in getting government the heck out of the way. They still talk like that, but they donâ€™t seem to actually be operating like that. Senate and House Republicans seem to be in a bidding war to increase revenue in Washington. Whatâ€™s worse, they are mendacious enough to call it â€œincreasing revenueâ€ instead of â€œtax increases,â€ when it amounts to the same thing. The Republican Party of John Boehner and Mitch McConnell have taken a party that once believed in starving the beast and transforming it into a party that believes in feeding the leviathan lest the leviathan consume them. They operate out of fear â€” fear of losing their remaining power, fear of blame, and fear of the unknown.
[…] Â The fiscal cliff is actually a bipartisan compromise that congress critters and their friends in the press have now given a spooky name to scare the American people lest Washington have to take the medicine it prescribed itself. The Republicans were complicit in this arrangement.
Republicans and Democrats punted and punted on the Bush tax cuts and they arranged a debt ceiling increase that would, should a committee designed to fail actually fail, force draconian cuts that both sides could scream about and demand be rejected. So Washington would get a debt ceiling increase, but would not actually have to suffer the pain of cuts. Republicans and Democrats collaborated to design a medicine so vile they could ask the publicâ€™s forgiveness if they chose not to take it and design a more sugary medicine instead.
But one way or the other, the medicine must now be taken.
[…] Â So what the heck does the GOP actually stand for? Right now, they seem to want to be the â€œresponsibleâ€ party, but know theyâ€™re going to get blamed for whatever happens. They are scared of their own shadow. They are caving, but to what?
I couldnâ€™t tell you. I have no idea what John Boehner and Mitch McConnellâ€™s Republican Party stands for other than the acquisition and maintenance of their own power. Theyâ€™re Bob Michel without the charm willing to take scraps from the Democratsâ€™ table so long as they can sit on the floor next to it. Their own plans are designed around tactics, not strategy, and tactics designed to avoid as much blame as possible for a mess they were complicit in creating.
I canâ€™t tell you what they stand for anymore.
That’s why it’s more important than ever for the Tea Party to zero in on these RINO’s and oust every last one of them in 2014.