And he has the gall to tell taxpayers we need “shared sacrifice”? Â How about you STAY OUT OF MY WALLET and stop spending my hard-earned money on your Czarist perks?!?
I can’t believe we have to foot the bill for this spoiled narcissist for another four years!
The prospect of pitching over the federal “fiscal cliff” isn’t stopping the White House from moving forward with President Obama’s year-end Hawaii vacation plans.
Even as Republicans and Democrats report minimal progress so far in talks to meet a deadline to avoid sharp tax hikes and spending cuts, the White House was moving forward with the first family’s and friends’ $4 million vacation to Mr. Obama’s native state.
Perhaps the most ironic part about the Presidentâ€™s trip is that it will run the State of Hawaii and the American taxpayer up to $4 million in billsâ€¦ during a crisis that was caused by too much government spending.
Both parties agree that Washington is blowing too much money: that is certainlyÂ notÂ under debate. Â Interestingly enough, Republicans seek to cut entitlements, but Democrats are hoping to slash military spending. Â Yet, the Hawaii Reporter article indicates that the President will be spending almost a half-million dollars (or more) on C-17 military aircraft transports for limos, a Navy SEAL mobile security detail, and the list goes on…
Peter Roff at US News recommends that Obama cancel his trip and show some leadership (as if the Narcissist-in-Chief could be bothered):
The country is on the brink of an economic apocalypse and the president has his eyes on his upcoming $4 million family and friends holiday trip to Hawaii.
Someone’s priorities are a bit out of whack. He’s either not serious about the responsibilities of being president, he actuallywantsÂ the country to go over the cliff, or the coming crisis is not as serious as we have been led to believe it would be. If the stakes are really as high as all that, the family Christmas trip needs to be put on holdâ€”or moved to someplace close like Camp David.Â Being president means shouldering the responsibilities of the presidencyâ€”something for which Obama has not exactly shown much enthusiasm. He’s comfortable with the trappings of office, the symbols of power, but on the responsibilities he’s been kind of out to lunch in a lot of ways. He hasn’t shown much leadership beyond stating what he wants and expecting folks to fall in line. And, having done that, he once again feels the need to get out of town while letting other people hash the details out.Â This is not leadership. It’s not even good management. It’s a recipe for chaos, which should leave no one unclear about whose responsibility the current mess actually is.
Must be nice to live high on the hog with other people’s money…that was taken by force. Â Mark Steyn calls it the “Royal Presidency“:
Say what you like about a high-living, big-spending, bloated, decadent, parasitical, wastrel monarchy, but, compared to the citizen-executive of a republic of limited government, itâ€™s a bargain. So, while the lovely Duchess of Cambridge nurses her baby bump, the equally radiant president of the United States nurses his ever more swollen debt belly. He and his family are about to jet off on their Christmas vacation to watch America slide off the fiscal cliff from the luxury beach resort of Kailua. The cost to taxpayers of flying one man, his wife, two daughters, and a dog to Hawaii is estimated at $3,639,622. For purposes of comparison, the total bill for flying the entire royal family (Queen, princes, dukes, the works) around the world for a year is Â£4.7 million â€” or about enough for two Obama vacations.
[…] Â Just for the record, William and Kate actually spent an â€œincredibleâ€ Â£51,410 â€” or about $80,000 â€” for nine business-class tickets on British Airways to Heathrow. At the check-in desk at Los Angeles, BA graciously offered the Duke and Duchess an upgrade to first class. By now youâ€™re probably revolted by this glimpse of disgusting monarchical excess, so, if itâ€™s any consolation, halfway through the flight the cabinâ€™s entertainment consoles failed and, along with other first-class passengers, Their Highnesses were offered a Â£200 voucher toward the cost of their next flight, which they declined.
By contrast, in a republic governed by â€œwe, the people,â€ when the president of the United States wishes to watch a film, there are two full-time movie projectionists who live at the White House and are on call round the clock, in case heâ€™s overcome by a sudden urge to watch Esther Williams inÂ Dangerous When WetÂ (1953) at two in the morning. Does one of them accompany the first family on Air Force One? If the movie fails halfway across the Pacific, will the president and first lady each be offered a $2 million voucher in compensation?
In his recent bookÂ Presidential Perks Gone Royal, Robert Keith Gray, a former Eisenhower staffer, revealed that last year the U.S. presidency cost American taxpayers $1.4 billion. Over the same period, the entire royal family cost British taxpayers about $57 million. Thereâ€™s nothing â€œroyalâ€ about the current level of â€œpresidential perksâ€: The Obama family costs taxpayers more than every European royal house put together.
In other news,Â Obama’s Inauguration ceremony will cost taxpayers $100 million. Â In contrast, the Queen’s Diamond Jubilee cost $51 Million.
Why did we get rid of King George, again?