Contrary to the lies of “pro-choice” activists, the pro-life movement works to provide REAL choices for women: crisis pregnancy centers, adoption services, foster homes for unwed mothers, assistance for single mothers, counseling, and dozens of other services provided by people who care for both the baby AND the mother.
Liberal writers such as Matthew Yglesias are given to observing that pro-lifers believe that â€œlife begins at conception and ends at birth.â€ At Commonweal, David Gibson, a journalist who frequently covers the abortion debate,Â asksÂ how much pro-lifers do for mothers: â€œI just want to know what realistic steps they are proposing or backing. Iâ€™m not sure Iâ€™d expect to hear anything from pro-life groups now since thereâ€™s really been nothing for years.â€
This lazy slander is as common as it is untrue. Of course, there is much more that needs to be done, but in the decades since Roe v. Wade, pro-lifers have taken the lead in offering vital services to mothers and infants in need. Operating with little supportâ€“and often actual oppositionâ€“from agencies, foundations, and local governments, pro-lifers have relied upon a network of committed donors and volunteers to make great strides in supporting mothers and their infants. Itâ€™s time the media takes notice.
In the United States there are some 2,300 affiliates of the three largestÂ pregnancy resource center umbrella groups, Heartbeat International, CareNet, and the National Institute of Family and Life Advocates (NIFLA).
Over 1.9 million American women take advantage of these services each year. Many stay at one of the 350 residential facilities for women and children operated by pro-life groups. In New York City alone, there are twenty-two centers serving 12,000 women a year. These centers provide services including pre-natal care, STI testing, STI treatment, ultrasound, childbirth classes, labor coaching, midwife services, lactation consultation, nutrition consulting, social work, abstinence education, parenting classes, material assistance, and post-abortion counseling.
[…] Â If pro-life Americans provide so many (often free) services to the poor and vulnerableâ€“work easily discovered by any researcher or journalist with an Internet connectionâ€“why are they sometimes accused of caring only for life inside the womb? Quite possibly, it is the conviction of abortion advocates that â€œcaring for the bornâ€ translates first and always into advocacy for government programs and funds. In other words, abortion advocates appear to conflate charitable works and civil society with government action. The pro-life movement does not. Rather, it takes up the work of assisting women and children and families, one fundraiser and hotline and billboard at a time. Still, the pro-life movement is not unsophisticated about the relationship between abortion rates and government policies in areas such as education, marriage, employment, housing, and taxation. The Catholic Church, for example, works with particular vigor to ensure that its social justice agenda integrates advocacy for various born, vulnerable groups, with incentives to choose life over abortion.
One of the significant ironies of accusing pro-lifers of being â€œanti-vulnerable,â€ â€œanti-women,â€ and â€œanti-poorâ€ is that poor womenÂ tend to be more pro-lifeÂ than their more privileged counterparts. It is especially important, therefore, to offer them options that do not simply appeal to their economic interest or personal autonomy narrowly understood, but rather that accord with their moral outlook and overall wellbeing.