And so it begins….a local stationÂ just aired an entire report making excuses for the bomber because he’s “young” and “misguided.” Claimed that it’s his age that’s the problem. Claimed that his motive is “unknown.” Totally ignored the fact that the pedophile butcher that he worships as a prophet encouraged his followers to follow his violent example. I’m SO sick of the media in this country bending over backwards to give violent radical Islamists a pass!
On Rush Limbaughâ€™s Friday program, fill-in host Mark Steyn reminded listeners of Limbaughâ€™s TuesdayÂ comments predictingÂ the media would â€œcircle the wagonsâ€ for Islam if it turned out that the suspects in Mondayâ€™s Boston Marathon bombing Muslims, saying that the prediction will come true.
As it turned out, the suspects Tamerlan Tsarnaev and Dzhokhar Tsarnaev were indeed Muslims, and Steyn, author of Â â€œAfter America: Get Ready for Armageddon,â€ said the media wagon-circling would begin â€œany moment now.â€
â€œAs we now know, these guys are Muslim,â€ Steyn said. â€œOne of them was Muslim. Heâ€™s dead â€” he died in the early hours this morning. The other guy, still on the lam, is Muslim â€” Muslims from Chechnya. And so, as usual, any moment now weâ€™ll start to hear, â€˜Oh well, these are just lone wolves,â€™ as Rush said. â€˜Theyâ€™re not typical of anything.â€™ None of these guys are ever typical of anything.â€
â€œWhy would Chechen refugees, whoâ€™ve been locked for nearly two decades in a bitter, violent conflict against the Russian government, harbor such anger against the United States that theyâ€™d want to carry out a terrorist attack at the Boston Marathon?â€ Politico asks.
â€œThe answer is far from obvious,â€ it concludes.
Those few lines sum up the whole problem with our war on terror. A Muslim terrorist attack by Muslim terrorists? Why? The political establishment has spent decades choosing to ignore the basic facts. Then each time itâ€™s baffled when the obvious happens.
The motives are obvious enough.
Tamerlan Tsarnaevâ€™sÂ YouTube channel had aÂ playlist titled â€œIslamâ€ and another playlist titled â€œTerroristsâ€. That should be obvious enough even for Politico.
This disconnect between our alleged bad behavior and the motives of the jihadists is starkly obvious in the case of the Boston terrorists. If Chechen Muslims have a beef with anyone, itâ€™s the Russians. When jihadist terrorism became a problem in Chechnya, there were no â€œhearts and mindsâ€ campaigns, no solicitous outreach, no infusions of foreign aid, no apologies for past sins, no careful adherence to the laws of war, the Geneva conventions, or human rights, no courting of imams to provide insights into the wonderfulness of Islam. The Russians employed torture, assassination, group reprisals, and in the end ringed Grozny with artillery and left it in ruins. In the two Chechen wars the Russians killed around 150,000 people. In fact, Russia has been killing Muslims since the 18thÂ century, and occupied Muslims lands in Central Asia for 80 years under the Soviet Union. So tell me, Senator Rand Paul or Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel, if our foreign policy misbehavior explains jihadist hatred, how is that two centuries of Russian violence against Muslims is ignored, and all our blood and treasure spent to liberate and help Muslims count for nothing?
No more convincing are the other rationalizations for Muslim violence. Lack of education and economic opportunity exist all over the world, but African Christians and animists, or Indian Hindus and Buddhists donâ€™t commit acts of terrorism with anywhere near the same frequency as Muslims. Plenty of people across the globe live under oppressive dictators who routinely violate human rights, and they donâ€™t turn to terrorism against distant strangers in response. Tibetans arenâ€™t donning suicide vests or bombing marathons. Millions and millions of impoverished everywhere donâ€™t kill innocent people in random attacks in countries far from their homes. Every excuse for Muslim violence collapses beneath the weight of such facts. Meanwhile, the one factor all these killersâ€“â€“rich or poor, educated or not, politically oppressed or otherwiseâ€“â€“have in common, Islam, is preemptively rejected as the explanation for the violence.
This â€œwillful blindness,â€ as Andy McCarthy calls, has become dangerous. It reflects the arrogance of secular materialism, which has discounted religion as a mere life-style choice, usually benignâ€“â€“unless youâ€™re talking about gun-toting, racist, misogynist, homophobic evangelical Christians, or racist, land-grabbing Zionist Jews. No, itâ€™s about psychological trauma caused by globalization, or Islamophobia, or insensitive insults to Mohammed, or Israelâ€™s oppression of Palestinians, or anything and everything other than the numerous passages in the Koran, hadiths, and 14 centuries of Islamic jurisprudence and theology, which clearly and consistently set out the doctrine of violent jihad against infidels.
So expect in the coming weeks the same old commentary about foreign-policy blowback, or two-bit psychological analyses of personal trauma, or Israelâ€™s sins and Bushâ€™s wars, or American intolerance and xenophobia, or our need to â€œreach outâ€ and â€œengageâ€ and â€œrespectâ€ and â€œunderstandâ€ the fanatics who donâ€™t want our outreach, tolerance, or respect, but our deaths. In short, expect more public reasons for the jihadists to believe we are weak and corrupt and thus deserving to die.