You should always be prepared to defend yourself, your home and your family. Â Even more so if you live in a cash-strapped county.
This is what happens when local governments – their economies decimated by Big Government policies and regulations – become dependent on federal handouts and then lose those funds.
Josephine County was once able to pay for their own law enforcement without federal assistance, but that was before radical environmentalists and their pet federal regulations got a stranglehold on the local economy, killing their timber and mining industries.
A terrified woman from Josephine County, Oregon, dialed 911 to report that her violent ex-boyfriend is trying to break into her home, but in response she was told that there are no officers on duty to help her.
The cash-strapped sheriffâ€™s department in the county had been forced to lay off 23 of its 29 deputies after losing millions in federal aid. The remaining six officers had their shifts slashed to eight hours Monday through Friday.
Unfortunately for the woman faced with an out-of-control jilted lover, her 911 call came on a Saturday.
Eventually, the crazed man forced his way into the house, choked his former girlfriend and raped her without no one there to stop him.
The suspect, Michael Bellah, was later arrested and pleaded guilty to kidnapping, assault and sex abuse.
The details of her horrific ordeal last August emerged on Tuesday after voters in Josephine and Curry counties with the lowest property taxes in the state turned down tax increases that would have increased the number of officers on the force.
Even if the county residents were to approve the levy, which would have raised taxes from 59 cents to $1.48 per $1,000 of property value for the next three years, it would have been too late for one local woman.
Liberals are of course blaming the voters and those evil Republicans for refusing to raise property taxes to make up the difference for a government-created problem. Â Â But why should financially struggling residents be forced to pay more when the problem could be solved by simply getting government off the back of local industries?
In Egypt, the Muslim Brotherhood government that Obama arms, funds and supports is violently persecuting religious minorities, using our tax money to do it:
Egyptâ€™s Muslim Brotherhood’s governing majority, is not actually crucifying the nationâ€™s Christians. But they are nonetheless actively persecuting Coptic Christians who are said to be one-tenth of the population of the largest Arab country. A photograph of two young men set afire during recent demonstrations is pretty striking.
Demonstrations have turned into riots as Egyptâ€™s police cracked down on the Copts. The Copts were protesting against increasing sectarian violence directed at the countryâ€™s Christian minority.
Typically, what has been happening is the Copts protest against Islamist violence directed at them and their churches. St. Markâ€™s Cathedral has been the target of Muslim extremists in recent week. When the Copts face police, they get tear gassed. And then they are the ones arrested. The Muslim Brotherhood authorities will pick up Coptic youthâ€”hopefully the ones not yet set on fireâ€”and jail them.
Then, the police grab some of the Islamists perpetrators and jail them. Later, following a much-ballyhooed â€œreconciliation,â€ the authorities release allâ€”perpetrators and victims alike.
Syriaâ€™s Christians fear an Islamist takeover should the current government be overthrown. During the ongoing civil war there has been a well-documented rise in the number of salafi-jihadist groups operating in Syria that pose a direct threat to Syriaâ€™s Christian community. These militant opposition forces espouse an Islamist ideology, which incorporates elements of Wahhabism and Salafism and whose stated goals and objectives are by definition hostile towards Christians. Firsthand accounts from Syrian Christian refugees in Lebanon reported by award winning investigative journalist Nuri Kino detail the horror in which they described kidnappings, rapes, harassment, theft and other violent reprisals at the hands of Islamist groups.
Those who survived reported â€œjust being Christian is enough to be a target,â€ disproving theories that violence and kidnapping directed towards Syrian Christians is purely incidental or for economic reasons.
Funny how Marxists don’t recognize your unalienable right to keep the fruits of your labor (especially if you happen to be more successful than they think you should be), but they claim that they have a “right” to demand free goodies at the expense of others.
Speaking outside on a sunny day, Harris-Perry says in an ad that aired Wednesday morning:
Americans will always want some level of inequality, because itâ€™s a representation of meritocracy.Â People whoÂ work hard and sacrifice and saveÂ their money and make major contributions â€”Â we think that they should earn a little more.Â They should have more resources, and thatâ€™s fine.Â But we also, however, have to have a floor under which nobody falls.Â And if youâ€™re below that â€” especially if youâ€™re a child and youâ€™re below that â€” we are not going to accept that.Â YouÂ doÂ have the the right to health care, and to education, and to decent housing and to quality food at all times. Â â€‹[Emphasis added]
When something is a “right” (your life or conscience, for instance), it means you don’t have to do anything to earn it. You get to have it just for existing. It’s a gift from your Creator.
When you describe goods and services like foodÂ and housing as “rights,” you are saying that the people who produce these goods and services are obligated to provide them for you, whether you pay for them or not. There’s a word for this: slavery. Only slaves are forced to produce for others without compensation. TRUE rights come from God, and are unalienable. They cannot be provided by others, who could just as easily take them away.
You have an unalienable right to work and trade for goods and services. You do NOT have a “right” to demand them free of charge from others.
As the Democrats prepare to try to take back the House in 2014, they are beginning to realize that Obama’s permanent campaign arm, “Organizing For Action,” isn’t necessarily in their camp. Â They are competing with the Democrat party for fundraising dollars, and using the money to prop up the Cult of Obama, not the Democrat party.
Anyone who has been paying attention to the Obamessiah’s narcissistic behavior for the past four years could have seen this coming a mile away. Â Sadly, it appears the suckers at the DNC are only just realizing that their idol’s just not that into them.
President Barack Obamaâ€™s decision to launch his own political organization has some Democrats wondering: Is he just in it for himself?
Obamaâ€™s new group, Organizing for Action, will focus on his policy agenda â€“ not on electing Democratic candidates â€“ by raising unlimited amounts of cash and accessing the presidentâ€™s secret list of 20 million supporters, volunteers and donors.
The operation wonâ€™t share money, resources or the priceless Obama email list with the Democratic National Committee or campaign committees that help elect members of Congress, governors and legislators. And it has no plans to coordinate efforts, leading some Democrats to worry that it will take money and manpower away from the party as it heads into the 2014 elections for control of Congress.
â€œThereâ€™s only so much money to go around in Democratic circles. Thereâ€™s a limited pool of resources,â€ said Gilda Cobb Hunter, a South Carolina legislator and a member of theÂ Democratic National Committee.Â â€œWhy canâ€™t we strengthen one entity?â€
[…] Â Days before his second term began, Obama announced that his campaign would morph into a nonprofit, tax-exempt group to rally support across the country for his agenda. â€œOrganizing for Action will be an unparalleled force in American politics,â€ he told supporters.
Other presidents have created or championed organizations outside the major national parties. Bill Clinton, for example, embraced the Democratic Leadership Council, an organization that pushed a moderate agenda.
But that functioned more as a think tank. And Obama is the first to form a group that will raise millions of dollars as it seeks to perpetuate a year-round campaign for him.
The decision to create Organizing for Action separate from the DNC, where a similar group was housed after the 2008 election, has prompted some Democrats to accuse Obama of focusing more on his legacy and less on his party.
What does Obama have to gain from withholding the e-mail list, siphoning away donations, and otherwise threatening to weaken the DNC’s 2014 campaign efforts? Â Is he trying to force them to come crawling to him to stay in power?
Every year, the federal government spends well over a trillion dollars more than it takes in. As a result, it has racked up seventeen trillion dollars in debt, most of it in the last decade. In seven years at current rates, the U.S. will need almost a fifth of the GDP from the rest of the world just to finance our national debt.
JustÂ twoÂ of our federal entitlements, Medicare and Social Security, have â€œunfunded future liabilitiesâ€ of $46.2 trillion. Total liabilities are $86.8 trillion or more. Entitlements and other mandatory spending will burden more and more of the federal budget in the coming years. At todayâ€™s burn rate, before long no realistic amount of tax revenue will be able to service the debt and fund the governmentâ€™s basic functions.
We need not worry about the federal government defaulting, since, unlike U.S. states or private citizens, it can print the money it needs to pay the bills. It can and will do so if we donâ€™t make a course correction fast. Massive monetary expansion will ultimately devalue every dollar in circulation and trigger the sort of hyperinflation that flattens entire societies in short order. Thatâ€™s bad enough, but when government borrows and spends for our supposed benefit,Â somebody elseÂ will have to foot some or all of the bill. If our faith applies to every aspect of life, then it must have something to say about this moral outrage.
[…] Â In the twentieth century, more than a hundred million people were murdered by their own governments. And that was just in communist countries. History and scripture agree: because of sin, governments with too much power become propagators of evil and destruction.
This speaks directly to government debt, since deficit spending is a symptom of government doing more than it can or should. The federal government now borrows and spends with such reckless abandon that it is careening toward a global economic catastrophe. If Christians canâ€™t muster the courage to speak out against what Rep. Paul Ryan has called â€œthe most predictable debt crisis in history,â€ we wonâ€™t deserve to be taken seriously after the collapse.
Sadly, many Christians don’t know how to disciple our nation to turn the tide because they’ve never studied God’s design for economics or the Biblical role of government. Â Â They can’t teach what they don’t know. Â The Â key to real reformation, says R.C. Sproul, Jr., is for Christians to understand and work to implement Biblical economic principles:
Christian author and teacherÂ R.C. Sproul, Jr.Â told CBN News Anchor Lee Webb that he believes it’s time to return to the basics when it comes to economics.
“When we’re left arguing about whether or not we should have a marginal tax rate of 45 percent or 48 percent, and the conservative is stuck arguing for the 45 percent we’ve had an insufficient reformation in our thinking,” Sproul said.
Sproul believes that reformation will happen only when we return to scripture to see what God has to say about economics. That’s why he produced a video series called “Economics for Everybody.” It’s a compelling, even entertaining approach to a topic many find boring.
[…] Â Â Sproul provides historical evidence that nations most influenced by biblical Christianity are nations that, by and large, have prospered. They are nations marked by decentralized governments and free markets.
But nations that reject God are marked by centralized power, tyranny, and no free markets. Unfortunately, he said he has observed some of those troubling trends in America now.
“The United States is not a free market. It’s an interventionist economy that’s been moving closer to socialism for over a century now,” he said. “I am not optimistic about our nation’s future economically.”
“We live in a country in which the state forbids me to hire a man unless I promise to pay him X number of dollars,” Sproul explained. “We now live in a country where I can’t hire 50 men unless I promise to buy them all health insurance, including access to abortion.”
“This is not economic liberty. This is not free markets,” he said. “We’re missing the fact that we’re the frog and the water is boiling.”
“It’s my conviction that education is always and everywhere religious,” he said.
“And it’s not a surprise that when 80 percent of evangelical parents have their children in the government’s schools that they’re going to embrace the religion of the government which is the worship of the state,” he said.
Sproul cautioned Christians to avoid despair. One way to do that is by returning to the beginning, to the Creation Mandate and begin to see that our work is part of worship.
This is why liberals keep successfully advancing their agenda…because they NEVER stop agitating and campaigning. Â Unlike conservatives, who go back to living our daily lives until the next election, Leftists keep the pressure on ALL THE TIME. Â It’s the Chicago Brown Shirt way.
If we’re going to beat them for the long haul, we can’t afford to rest on our laurels between elections anymore. Â We have to stay in the fight year-round.
As President Barack Obama delivered the State of the Union address, activists involved in his new non-profit advocacy group, Organizing for Action, gathered in local meetings around the country to watch and cheer him on. The new 501(c)4 organization, which is an offshoot of his re-election campaign, aims to support the presidentâ€™s policies and to project the power of the White House beyond Washington into local communities and media.
[…] Â Immediately after the speech ended, organizers turned the sound down on Sen. Marco Rubioâ€™s response and set up a laptop to hear a special message from president Obama, who would be addressing Organizing for Action activists on a national conference call. After a few minutes, Obamaâ€™s voice came through the speakers, telling the activists that he would be asking for their help in pushing Congress to adopt his second-term agenda.
There was something slightly different in his tone of voice. This was not a head of state addressing a nation; this was a local community organizer talking to his volunteers–not over them, but at them. The contrast in style created a feeling of intimacy, which made listeners feel he was speaking personally to them. Not everyone was convinced; one woman told me she doubted he would be able to achieve all he had set out to do.
Regardless, the very fact that the evening happened the way it did was a success for the new organization. The Obama camp believes it is less important to convince people with words than to condition them with deeds. And the deeds are not that complicated. For all the talk about high-tech voter turnout programs, the methods Obama uses to win are decidedly old-school. He wins because Republicans donâ€™t bother to do the same.
There’s another conference call this weekend, whenÂ former White House chief of staff Rahm Emanuel andÂ Organizing for Action Executive Director Jon Carson will be giving their foot soldiers their marching orders for advancing Obama’s economic agenda.
Republicans, where is your ground game to defeat this onslaught?
This idea of a second bill of “rights” that government should provide (food, housing, health care, etc.) goes back to FDR. Â Problem is, TRUE rights come from GOD, not government. Â Government’s job is merely to protect them (life, liberty, property, freedom of conscience, freedom of speech,etc.).
Any “right” that is granted by government can just as easily be taken away by government. Â Not only that, but it is done so at the expense of someone else who’s REAL rights are being violated so you can be give the “right” to something you haven’t earned.
Sunstein located the source of Obama’s inspiration in Franklin Delano Roosevelt’s 1944State of the Union address, rather than the South African constitution–though the American academics whose writings inspired South Africa’s ambitious Bill of Rights could well have taken Roosevelt’s proposals as their foundation.
[…] Â Â Obama is aiming at achieving a new set of socioeconomic rights, whether through law or through policy. It is the dream of progressives and liberals for the better part of a century–a dream that has resisted the reality that these “rights” are not justiciable; that they degrade the value of other, fundamental, rights; and they create more policy problems than they solve.
Labor unions and Hollywood donors are open to bankrolling Organizing for Action, the outside group that has been formed in support of President Obamaâ€™s second-term agenda.
Traditionally one of the biggest donors to Democrats, unions are considering putting their financial weight behind the group as it tries to harness the grassroots power of Obamaâ€™s reelection machine.
[…] Â Organizing for Action will reportedly have access to the voter database that helped the president win the White House again in his more than $1 billion reelection bid. Jon Carson, who worked in the White House Office of Public Engagement, is the groupâ€™s executive director.
To the dismay of campaign finance reformers, Organizing for Action will operate as a 501(c)(4), a tax-exempt vehicle that was used during the 2012 campaign to evade donor disclosure while spending hundreds of millions of dollars on campaign ads.
In a recent Sean Hannity program entitled, Boomtown, his 2 guests used the entire hour to show how corrupt Washington DC politics has become. “While one out of every 6 Americans wonder where their next meal is coming from, Washington DC has the highest rate of fine wine consumption in the United States,” said author Peter Schweizer of the Government Accountability Institute. Mr. Schweizer also pointed out that one out of four Americans has a mortgage that is underwater, while 7 out of 10 of the wealthiest counties in the nation are in the DC area. Furthermore, DC now has the highest per capita income in the US, recently passing Silicon Valley. How was this wealth created in a geographical area that doesn’t produce a product or create anything the public wants to purchase? Other boomtowns in our history became prosperous because they offered something to build upon. DC, however, offers nothing but connections to power and patronage. The result is a permanent political class invested in the growth of government as they grow their personalÂ portfolios.
Bannon, the executive chairman of Breitbart News, said the best and the brightest now come to Washington because they see Washington as a Tammany Hall that will allow them to get rich off of influence peddling. He noted that Washington D.C. runs the equivalent of a $4 trillion private equity fund every year and essentially doles out 25% of the country’s wealth to those who are connected.
“Nobody has ever turned a camera on them,” Bannon said, indicating he intends to change that in the future. “This is a permanent political class that has now formed an aristocracy. That’s why nothing has changed in Washington.”
Bannon explained people arrive in Washington as country lawyers and then decide to “turn the business of government into a family business” by having their wives and kids work in lobbying.
“And this is how they become a permanent political class,” he concluded.
Hannity mentioned that Washington politicians “kick money back to family, friends, or people that hire them when they retire.”
And Schweizer concurred. He claimed the permanent political class is bipartisan and those who are a part of this permanent aristocracy either marry or are born into it.
This is so predictable, and it reveals exactly what philosophy and tactics this “community organizing” apparatus will operate by. Â When Soros gets involved, nothing good can come of it. Â I’m only surprised Â he’s is allowing his involvement to be known publicly.
While Republicans contemplate how to improve their partyâ€™s political performance at the Republican National Committee (RNC) winter meeting, which opens today, Democrats are already taking politics to a new level, creating parallel organizations to advocate for President Barack Obamaâ€™s agenda and using their political clout to rearrange private business relationships to their liking. American politics has never seen anything like it.
PoliticoÂ reportsÂ today that major donors–including billionaire George Soros (above), bailout beneficiary Citi and others–were approached by Obama campaign veterans to donate millions to Organizing for America, the presidentâ€™s new 501(c)4 non-profit advocacy group. Under the tax code, 501(c)4 groups do not have to disclose their donors–a provision, ironically, that President Obama spent years campaigning against.
They justify the contradiction by insisting their money is for â€œgood government,â€, while money raised by conservative groups is â€œpoision,â€ according to Obama bundler Alan Solow, quoted by Politico. Still, the organizers maintain the pretense of involving small donors rather than highlighting the large checks that fund existing groups such as Media Matters and Center for American Progress to the tune of $60 million per year, combined.
In addition to Organizing for America, the left has already welcomed another new left-wing organization, the Democracy Initiative, which brings several activist and lobby groups together to agitate for their policy priorities. The Democracy Initiative builds on previous efforts, such as Health Care for America now, which worked with the Obama administration in 2009 to organize demonstrations in support of his heath reform law.
President Obama will remake his presidential campaign into a massive new movement Â devoted to supporting his agenda, an unprecedented move that creates a brand new political organization devoted not to a Party, not to an idea â€“ but to one charismatic leader.
The group, to be called Organizing for Action, opens for business Sunday, the day Obama is officially inaugurated.
If this type of organization has existed before in American politics on any similar scale, Iâ€™m not aware of it.
There are excellent reasons why we havenâ€™t had mass groups devoted to powerful leaders in this country. Our whole system of government is designed to provide checks to protect against the accretion of too much power, to forestall mob rule. A mass organization that does the bidding of a single individual who also happens to be the president of the United States undermines such intentions.
[…] Â OFA will be classified as a 501(c)4 group, which means donors can give it as much money as they want and none of the contributorsâ€™ names need be released. Never mind that Obama has ardently opposed this kind of thing for years.
Known during the campaign as Obama for America, the group includes the millions of people signed up to receive emails from the Obama campaign and thousands of activists ready to man phone banks, knock on doors, annoy their lawmakers and otherwise make things happen for the president.
The group was superbly well organized under campaign manager Jim Messina, who will maintain leadership. Senior Obama operatives like Robert Gibbs, David Plouffe,Â and Stephanie Cutter will sit on the board. The group will no doubt employ many of the leftist community organizing principles Obama learned years ago in Chicago.
This is the same group that bused in union thugs by the hundreds to try to intimidate Gov. Walker and the Republicans in Wisconsin. Â Under a new name, Obama now officially has his own official brown shirt brigade.
Just days after Piers Morgan claimed that both the Bible and the Constitution are “inherently flawed” and need to be amended, a Georgetown Constitutional Law professor published a piece in the New York Times that called for abolishing the “archaic, idiosyncratic and downright evil”Â US Constitution altogether:
Georgetown Law professor Louis Michael Seidman writes that the time has come to scrap the Constitution.
In an op-edÂ publishedÂ in the New York Times Monday, Seidman, a constitutional law professor, claimed that the nationâ€™s foundational document is the real impediment to progress and solutions to Americaâ€™s troubles.
â€œAs the nation teeters at the edge of fiscal chaos, observers are reaching the conclusion that the American system of government is broken,â€ Seidman wrote. â€œBut almost no one blames the culprit: our insistence on obedience to the Constitution, with all its archaic, idiosyncratic and downright evil provisions.â€
According to Seidman, the countryâ€™s insistence that it maintain the will of a centuries-old document â€œhas saddled us with a dysfunctional political system, kept us from debating the merits of divisive issues and inflamed our public.â€
SeidmanÂ callsÂ the Constitution â€œarchaic, idiosyncratic and downright evil.â€ Heâ€™s wrong, but at least he expresses his contempt for the rule of law openly and honestly, instead of insulting our intelligence with insincere twaddle about a â€œliving document.â€
[…] Â Seidman exercises hisÂ constitutional rightÂ to miss the point when he blames the fiscal cliff on the fact that revenue bills must originate in the House, or a â€œgrotesquely malapportioned Senate.â€ But those are the Constitutionâ€™s procedural restraints, the equivalent of Robertâ€™s Rules of Order. We got into this mess precisely by flouting its substantive limits on federal power.
Put simply, if the federal government only spent money on its constitutionally enumerated functions, there would be no fiscal cliff. No $1 trillion deficit. No $16 trillionÂ national debt. No $84 trillion in unfunded liabilities for the major entitlement programs and other federal commitments.
It is the constitutional disobedience our man at Georgetown advocates that has the country perpetually on the precipice of financial ruin. He is merely complaining about a too-slow process of dividing up the spoils.
What they’re really advocating here is a revolution to overthrow the United States as a constitutional republic, so they can replace it with a Socialist Oligarchy disguised as a Democracy. Â At least they’re now finally being honest about it.
The western world is rooting for the brutal Assad regime to fall, even calling for the US to arm the rebels, which Obama has been more than happy to do under the table.
What the West is refusing to recognize is that these rebels are radical Islamists who – as in Egypt – intend to impose 7th-century Islamic Sharia law, break peace with Israel and wage jihad against all “infidels.”
The Syrian Revolution is for the establishing of an Islamic state, and in so doing, Christians are being killed by the Islamist. But I fear the future, knowing that the time is coming in which a full out massacre will be implemented by the Islamist in Syria. The fall of Assad will mean a mass cleansing of anybody who believes in the Bible, since the Assad regime protects the Christian population.
Just in late November, two car bombs went off in a Christian and Druze suburb of Damascus killing forty-five and injuring 120. In a recent report by the UKâ€™s Independent, one SyrianÂ saidÂ that the rebels â€œwanted to kill us because we were Christians. They were calling us Kaffirs [infidels], even little children saying these things. Those who were our neighbours turned against usâ€.
Archbishop Issam John DarwishÂ saidÂ that there has been â€œan influx of jihadists in the rebels in the last six, seven monthsâ€.
[…] Â Right when Assadâ€™s regime topples, the Christians will be amongst the greatest victims.
[…] Â Where are the voices from major contemporary churches? Where is Rick Warren, Joel Olsteen? America and Europe have not offered any help for the Christians, and while mainstream churches stay silent, the U.S. government and Western allies are making matters worse. Within hours of Obamaâ€™s second victory,Â Western allies had alreadyÂ designed a development for Syria, expecting a much more aggressive approach to Syria by the president. England and Turkey have been discussing the use of NATO against Bashar al-Assad, expecting more support from Obama.
Lets not forget that Obama last month recognized the official Syrian opposition as a legitimate group,Â saying
Iâ€™m encouraged to see that the Syrian opposition created an umbrella group that may have more cohesion than theyâ€™ve had in the past, â€¦We consider them a legitimate representative of the aspirations of the Syrian people. Weâ€™re not yet prepared to recognize them as some sort of government in exile, but we do think that it is a broad-based representative group.
What will this do? Remember Egypt. What caused the Muslim Brotherhood in the Egyptian revolution to be so confident?Â They got Obamaâ€™s approvalÂ in his famous â€œNew Beginningâ€ speech of 2009 which he did in Cairo (a speech which, I believe, will be judged by history as one of the most destructive acts of a U.S. president).
Last night, all the major television networks chose not to show footage of violent union members in Michigan tearing down a tent owned by Americans for Prosperity, or footage of a union member punching Fox News contributor Steven Crowder in the face repeatedly. This is no surprise; the mainstream media is unconcerned with reports of union violence, which they apparently feel is justified enough not to warrant coverage.
â€œThe pro-union broadcast networks are deliberately censoring footage ofÂ thuggish union violence directed at conservatives,â€Â saidÂ Media Research President Brent Bozell. â€œIf a Tea Partier hadÂ physically assaulted a liberal journalist or ripped down a structure occupiedÂ by a liberal organization all on video, the footage would be broadcast on anÂ endless loop. ABC, CBS, and NBC have a responsibility to the American people toÂ expose whatâ€™s really happening in Michigan. Their double standard is absolutelyÂ outrageous.â€
White House spokesman Jay Carney declined to condemn the increasing violence and threats by union members in Michigan, merely telling reporters Tuesday that â€œthe president believes in debate thatâ€™s civil.â€
When asked by a reporter about a claim by Michigan state Democrat that â€œthere will be bloodâ€ should Republicans pass a union-choice law in Michigan, Carney professed ignorance and then downplayed the comment.
â€œI havenâ€™t see those comments, and Iâ€™m not sure they mean what someone interprets them to mean,â€ he said.
The union violence, which included at least one televised assault on a journalist, followed an Obama rally in Michigan Dec. 10, when he declared that right-to-work laws are a political effort to slash wages.
Obamaâ€™s Dec. 10 speech did not call for civil debate, or non-violence.
Of course the media is ignoring leftist violence, because it doesn’t fit their narrative that the left is “tolerant” and it’s those “right wing extremist” Tea Partiers you supposedly have to worry about.
Unions are like the mob. Â They want you to pay them for “protection,” when in fact they are the true oppressors and extortionists.
Michigan is finally restoring workers’ God-given freedom of association, meaning they can freely choose whether or not to join a union without having to worry about coercion or dues forcibly confiscated from their paychecks.
Unions are furious, of course, and their thugs have been descending on the capitol the same way that they did in Wisconsin.
The Community Organizer-in-Chief was more than happy to fly in on Monday to attack the new state legislation as the “right to work for less.”
Jaw-dropping lie alert: Obama tells workers right-to-work laws â€œtake away your rights to bargain for better wages,â€ in reality it stops workers from beingÂ forcedÂ to join a union as a condition of employment. Nothing in those laws relates to collective bargaining. So heâ€™s either grossly misinformed or lying his ass off.
I’m going with the latter. Â Besides, what business is it of the president’s when the voters of an individual state and their representative choose to pass a law that it is the best interest of their taxpayers and workers? Â President Obama has no business sticking his nose in state matters – period!
A top Michigan Democrat is looking to President Obama to deliver retribution to Republicans after theÂ GOP-dominated state legislature approved a package of bills that could make this stronghold of union power the nationâ€™s 24th right-to-work state as early as next week.
SenateÂ Democratic LeaderÂ Gretchen Whitmer, who on Thursday called the votes to approve the right-to-work measure â€œpetty and vindictive politics,â€ sparked more backlash Friday when she said she wants the president…to push back on RepublicanÂ Gov. Rick SnyderÂ by holding back federal money for a new international bridge project toÂ CanadaÂ and a badly needed mass-transit program in ailing Detroit.
“This is just the first round of a battle that’s going to divide this state. We’re going to have a civil war,” Hoffa said on CNN’s “Newsroom.”
Ever wonder why unions bear an uncanny resemblance to the mob? Â They’re not willing to let anyone leave “the family” alive.
Just in case you were wondering how serious they are about retaliation for this threat to their power and gravy train, a Democrat state representative actually threatened “there will be blood” on the house floor of the Michigan state house:
Steven Crowder is a comedian who has conducted dozens of on-camera interviews in venues like this, and he’s NEVER been physically attacked…until now. Â When union thugs attacked a tent full of conservative Americans For Prosperity activists and Crowder tried to help the the people trapped inside, several union protesters punched him. Â When he tried to get away, one grabbed him by the back of his shirt to drag him back into the fight:
â€œTo compel a man to furnish funds for the propagation of ideas he disbelieves and abhors is sinful and tyrannical.â€ â€“ Thomas Jefferson
Right to Work laws protect the right of employees to choose for themselves whether or not to join or financially support a union. Longtime readers of my work know that Iâ€™ve been exposing the compulsory-union dues racket since my days as a columnist at the Seattle Times. Hereâ€™s my 1999 column on howÂ public school teachers in Washington stateÂ challenged their union over their political dues power grab.Â Here are your rightsÂ as a union worker. Here is aÂ backgrounder on the permissible use of forced dues.Â As I wrote onÂ Labor DayÂ in 2010, free speech not only means the freedom to voice your political views, but also the freedom from being forced to pay for someone elseâ€™s.
U.S. Supreme Court precedent established by the D.C.-basedÂ National Right to Work Legal Defense FoundationÂ guarantees the right to full financial disclosure from a union and a right to challenge the figures in court if they disagree.
As Doug Powers noted this morning, the teachersâ€™ unions are up to their usual,Â power-protecting antics. Despite the re-election of their crony in the White House, state revolts â€” and courageous individual union members â€” are successfully pushing back against the forcedÂ redistributionÂ ofÂ dues moneyÂ from rank-and-file workers to Big Labor bosses.